PHOENIX — In a major legislative step that puts Arizona at the forefront of national efforts to combat campus antisemitism, the Arizona House of Representatives enacted HB2867, the Antisemitism in Education Act.
Bipartisan support for the bill, which was introduced by Republican Representative Michael Way of Legislative District 15, shows that antisemitism is a problem in Arizona's school system. The governor's office has yet to take any action on the legislation.
HB2867 creates several regulations that forbid instructors, administrators, and university professors from encouraging antisemitic behavior or requiring students to support antisemitic beliefs in order to receive academic credit.
The law establishes a systematic complaint and investigation procedure that requires an institutional response within 30 days and prohibits the use of public funding for antisemitic programming or training. The law also enables court action only after administrative remedies have been tried and creates an appeals process through school boards or the Arizona Board of Regents.
Following increasing campus tensions since the October 7, 2023 attacks in Israel, the Arizona legislation is in line with similar initiatives across the country. Parallel federal legislation sponsored by Florida Representative Randy Fine would alter the Civil Rights Act of 1965 to specifically forbid antisemitism in programs receiving federal funding.
Does Texas have a constitutional right to defy Supreme Court on protecting its border?
The measure reflects a number of significant aspects of Arizona politics:
Republican Majority Priorities:
By highlighting the connections between education policy and more general security issues, the measure backs the House Republican Majority Plan's public safety priorities.
Federal Cooperation:
Arizona aligns itself with federal standards by adopting the definition of antisemitism provided by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), which is already accepted by the U.S. State Department.
Constitutional Position:
The bill protects teaching on Israel, the Holocaust, and Jewish history while clearly stating that it does not violate the First Amendment.
The fact that the proposal was passed by both parties indicates that Arizona lawmakers believe antisemitism cuts across traditional partisan lines. However, gubernatorial action and subsequent implementation will determine the bill's final impact.
While the bipartisan support may add to the pressure for gubernatorial approval, Representative Way's assertion that "this should be an easy decision for the governor" demonstrates Republican confidence in the legislation's political viability.
Starting with institutional self-regulation, the bill establishes a multi-tiered enforcement mechanism that moves via administrative appeals and, finally, permits judicial review. This strategy aims to strike a balance between supervisory procedures and institutional autonomy.
With HB2867, Arizona joins a national dialogue on free speech, educational standards, and campus climate. The outcome of the legislation could have an impact on such initiatives in other states and advance changing federal policy debates over civil rights and education.
