Two Arizona lawmakers are moving forward with legislation aimed at preventing teacher strikes and organized protests after a recent wave of coordinated sick-outs led to school closures across the state.
House Education Committee Chairman Matt Gress (R-AZ) and Senate Education Committee Chair Hildy Angius (R-AZ) are introducing the plan as a striker amendment to House Bill 2313.
The measure would make it illegal for public or charter school teachers to participate in any organized demonstrations against their employer.
Under the proposed law, teachers who join a coordinated strike could lose certain employment protections, including civil service status, reemployment rights, and other benefits.
However, the lawmakers said the penalty would apply only when a group acts together to disrupt regular instruction, not in individual personnel matters.
The legislation also ties school funding to in-person classroom learning. If a district shifts to remote instruction because of an organized work stoppage, the Arizona Department of Education could reduce its funding. Approved online programs, emergency situations, or alternative instructional schedules would not be included.
Reasoning Behind Measure
The proposal comes after several school campuses were closed on January 30 when thousands of teachers and staff called out sick at once. Growing protests regarding Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) reportedly affected schools in Phoenix, Mesa, Chandler, and other cities, leading to class cancellations.
Gress said the goal of the legislation is to ensure students receive consistent, in-person instruction. “When adults coordinate mass call-outs to shut down campuses, that is a strike in practice. It robs students of instructional time and throws working parents into chaos,” he said. “When educators walk out, children are left behind.”
Angius said the closures revealed how vulnerable families can be to sudden disruptions. “Parents send their children to school expecting stability and instruction, not sudden closures driven by organized protest,” she said. “Using sick leave to shut down campuses crosses a line and undermines trust in public schools.”
The lawmakers are grounded in the idea that if students aren't physically in classrooms, schools shouldn't receive full in-person funding.
Supporters say the law protects families who rely on schools staying open and predictable. Critics argue that teachers have every right to speak out on issues impacting their communities.
The debate is only getting started as the measure is expected to be considered soon.
“Arizona students deserve classrooms that stay open and leaders who put education first,” the lawmakers concluded.
