Arizona Politics

Sinema Says Democrats Should Not Have Ended Judicial Filibuster in Senate After Trump Immunity Ruling

Congressional Democrats continue denouncing the Supreme Court's recent ruling that former President Donald Trump has immunity from prosecution for actions taken in an official capacity. This decision, which has sparked outrage towards SCOTUS, has raised serious concerns about the future of the judicial system. Senator Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ) suggested that the end of the judicial filibuster can be blamed for this.

In a brief post on X (formerly Twitter), Sen. Sinema stated, "Maybe it wasn't a great idea to eliminate the judicial filibuster."

The Arizona Senator referred to the decision by the late Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) and a Democratic majority in 2013 to eliminate the process. Famously dubbed "the nuclear option," Sen. Reid and the Democrats eliminated the filibuster for a majority of appointments to the executive and judicial branches except for the Supreme Court.

In November of that year, then-Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) told Democrats, "You'll regret this, and you may regret this a lot sooner than you think."

Upon the election of Donald Trump in 2016 and with a Republican majority in the upper chamber again, Sen. McConnell fulfilled his warning by killing the filibuster for the Supreme Court nominees and lowering the threshold for confirmation from 60 votes to a simple majority of 51, paving the way for the appointments of Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett.

Hence, the Supreme Court's 6-3 decision that Trump was immune from prosecution for actions within his constitutional authority as President, although Justice John Roberts clarified that the lower courts must determine what these actions are, and Trump can still be prosecuted for actions outside of office or for breaching his authority.

Many Democrats and liberals on X (formerly Twitter) claimed that should Trump be reelected, he would become a dictator. As a result, they also suggested that Biden could use his authority as President to officially remove Trump from the election, including using military force and canceling the upcoming election.

Representative Andy Biggs (R-AZ) mocked these suggestions, saying, "The Not So Tolerant Left is falling apart because of a rightly decided SCOTUS ruling. What happened to "defending our democracy?"

Grayson Bakich

Grayson Bakich is a Florida and Arizona legislative correspondent for The Floridian and Cactus Politics, specializing in national and state-level politics. With three years' experience covering federal Florida, and Arizona politics, they have been cited by NewsBreak, SGT Report, Lucianne.com, and Cause Action. Email: grayson@dnm.news

Recent Posts

Andy Biggs Condemns Southern Poverty Law Center for Alleged Fraud

Representative Andy Biggs (R-AZ) weighed in on the recent indictment of the Southern Poverty Law…

2 days ago

Yassamin Ansari Urges Administration to Shield Iranians From Deportation to Active War Zone

With bombs falling on Tehran and protests being met with deadly force inside Iran, a…

2 days ago

Arizona Republicans Set to Pass Budget Without Governor's Input

Arizona's Republican-controlled Legislature is moving forward with its own state budget plan, setting up another…

2 days ago

Arizona School Safety Bill Stalls in House After Bipartisan Pushback

An Arizona bill meant to improve how schools and law enforcement communicate during emergencies hit…

3 days ago

Mark Kelly Introduces Bill Demanding Transparency on Trump Medicine Deals

Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) has introduced legislation demanding transparency on the various agreements between President…

3 days ago

Ruben Gallego Introduces Bill Protecting Mail-In Voting, Nullifying Trump's EO

Senator Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) has introduced legislation to protect mail-in voting in response to an…

3 days ago