Representative Eli Crane (R-AZ) demanded accountability for federal judges in a post to X (formerly Twitter) after the D.C. Circuit Court overturned another injunction issued against President Donald Trump.
In April, Judge Tanya Chutkan, an appointee of President Barack Obama, issued a preliminary injunction against the Trump Administration after they attempted to terminate a $16 billion contract between the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and five nonprofits to reduce greenhouse gas emissions via the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Program.
On Tuesday, the injunction was overruled 2-1, saying it was within President Trump's authority to withdraw the funds.
Rep. Crane responded to the news, shared by Politico's Kyle Cheney, by quoting part of the judges' ruling, "We conclude the district court abused its discretion in issuing the injunction."
"How much abuse is enough to merit any kind of accountability?" Rep. Crane then asked.
The Arizona Congressman has been a vocal critic of various federal judges who have issued injunctions against President Trump as a means of hindering his agenda.
At the beginning of February, Crane introduced articles of impeachment against U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer of the Southern District of New York, who blocked Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) employees from accessing sensitive Treasury records in an effort to uncover government waste, fraud, and abuse.
Later in March, the Arizona Congressman discussed how Republicans could counter these judges who are overstepping their authorities, saying, "We have Article I powers of impeachment. And so I said, 'Hey, let's throw down. Let's send a shot across their bow; let's put these judges on notice that they can be impeached if they overstep their authority and try to stop the President from exercising his constitutional authority. And so it was really simple."
During that same month, Representative Andy Biggs (R-AZ) introduced the Injunctive Authority Clarification Act, which prohibits federal courts from issuing injunctive orders that bar enforcement of a federal law or policy against a nonparty unless a party in a class action lawsuit represents the nonparty.
