Featured

AG James Referred For Criminal Prosecution Due to Alleged Fraud

New York Attorney General Letitia James has been referred to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for real estate fraud following an investigation from the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA).

The referral could empower the DOJ to prosecute Attorney General James, who formerly used her power as attorney general to prosecute President Donald Trump for issues similar to those she is now being accused of. 

James campaigned on prosecuting President Trump, which she subsequently successfully did in a real estate civil fraud case that ruled Trump had to pay roughly $500 million to the New York state government.

Now, the FHFA is accusing James of real estate fraud following an investigation into her real estate properties, filings, and tax records. 

FHFA Director William J. Pulte alleged James had “falsified bank documents and property records to acquire government backed assistance and loans and more favorable loan terms.” 

Specifically, James is accused of having falsified her primary place of residence to secure more favorable loan terms. 

James allegedly reported Virginia as her primary place of residence while simultaneously claiming her primary residence was in New York - a requirement for being New York’s Attorney General. 

Additionally, James reportedly lied about her New York home, claiming it only had four units when in reality it contains five, in order to evade having to pay higher loan rates. 

It remains unclear whether the DOJ will prosecute James, but a guilty verdict against her would provide political and personal vindication for Trump. 

James’ office ridiculed the reports against James and stated James “will not be intimidated by bullies—no matter who they are.”

In the Trump civil fraud case, Trump has appealed the decision against him, which appeals Judge Peter Moulton reportedly defined as an “immense penalty” that “is troubling.”

Trump lawyers have consistently held that the charges and subsequent conviction are unjustifiable and often criticized by James and trial judge Arthur Engoron during the civil trial. 

The appeals court has yet to decide on the case.

Mateo Guillamont

Recent Posts

Arizona House Passes Bill to Put Medical Directives on IDs

The Arizona House of Representatives has passed State Representative Khyl Powell's (R-14) House Bill 2772,…

3 days ago

House Democrats Demand Pentagon Release Findings on Strike That Killed 170 Children

More than 120 House Democrats are demanding the Pentagon publicly release findings from its investigation…

3 days ago

Arizona House Passes Juvenile Justice Bill in Unanimous Vote

The Arizona House passed a bill this week aimed at narrowing the circumstances under which…

3 days ago

Tom Horne Pushes Back on Scholarship Account Fraud Claims

Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne is challenging what he calls a serious misrepresentation surrounding…

3 days ago

Mark Kelly Introduces Bill Cutting Taxes for Working-Class Americans

Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) has introduced legislation promising a massive tax cut for working-class Americans.…

3 days ago

Ruben Gallego Spearheads Bipartisan Letter Urging Protection of U.S. Steel Industry

Senator Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) is spearheading a bipartisan letter to the U.S. International Trade Commission…

3 days ago