Arizona Politics

Sinema Says Democrats Should Not Have Ended Judicial Filibuster in Senate After Trump Immunity Ruling

Congressional Democrats continue denouncing the Supreme Court's recent ruling that former President Donald Trump has immunity from prosecution for actions taken in an official capacity. This decision, which has sparked outrage towards SCOTUS, has raised serious concerns about the future of the judicial system. Senator Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ) suggested that the end of the judicial filibuster can be blamed for this.

In a brief post on X (formerly Twitter), Sen. Sinema stated, "Maybe it wasn't a great idea to eliminate the judicial filibuster."

The Arizona Senator referred to the decision by the late Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) and a Democratic majority in 2013 to eliminate the process. Famously dubbed "the nuclear option," Sen. Reid and the Democrats eliminated the filibuster for a majority of appointments to the executive and judicial branches except for the Supreme Court.

In November of that year, then-Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) told Democrats, "You'll regret this, and you may regret this a lot sooner than you think."

Upon the election of Donald Trump in 2016 and with a Republican majority in the upper chamber again, Sen. McConnell fulfilled his warning by killing the filibuster for the Supreme Court nominees and lowering the threshold for confirmation from 60 votes to a simple majority of 51, paving the way for the appointments of Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett.

Hence, the Supreme Court's 6-3 decision that Trump was immune from prosecution for actions within his constitutional authority as President, although Justice John Roberts clarified that the lower courts must determine what these actions are, and Trump can still be prosecuted for actions outside of office or for breaching his authority.

Many Democrats and liberals on X (formerly Twitter) claimed that should Trump be reelected, he would become a dictator. As a result, they also suggested that Biden could use his authority as President to officially remove Trump from the election, including using military force and canceling the upcoming election.

Representative Andy Biggs (R-AZ) mocked these suggestions, saying, "The Not So Tolerant Left is falling apart because of a rightly decided SCOTUS ruling. What happened to "defending our democracy?"

Grayson Bakich

Florida born and raised, Grayson Bakich is a recent recipient of a Master’s Degree in Political Science at the University of Central Florida. His thesis examined recent trends in political polarization and how this leads into justification of violence.

Recent Posts

Greg Stanton Calls for DHS Secretary's Removal After Year of FEMA Failures

Congressman Greg Stanton (D-AZ) and five House Democratic colleagues are demanding President Donald Trump fire…

14 hours ago

Judge Sets Deadlines in Minnesota's Lawsuit Against ICE

A federal judge on Wednesday did not take immediate action on the state of Minnesota’s…

14 hours ago

Trump Admin Cuts Addiction and Mental Health Funds

Thousands of federal grants funding mental health and addiction services were suddenly terminated late Tuesday…

15 hours ago

SNAKEBITE— 1.15.26— Clinton Skips Epstein Hearing— Yavapai-Apache Water Agreement— Trans Sports— State of State, Minneapolis, Ansari, Much More...

Clinton Skips Epstein Hearing Congressman Andy Biggs (R-AZ) left a congressional hearing room Tuesday with…

16 hours ago

After Bill Clinton Skips Epstein-Related Deposition, Andy Biggs asks 'What is he hiding?'

Congressman Andy Biggs (R-AZ) left a congressional hearing room Tuesday with one burning question about…

2 days ago

Mark Kelly, Ruben Gallego, and Eli Crane Introduce Bipartisan Yavapai-Apache Water Rights Agreement Bill

Senators Mark Kelly (D-AZ) and Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) and Representative Eli Crane (R-AZ) have introduced…

2 days ago