New Drone Restriction Along Southern Border Causes Concern Over Government Transparency

New Drone Restriction Along Southern Border Causes Concern Over Government Transparency

New drone restriction causes debate over government transparency

Ericka Piñon
Ericka Piñon
September 2, 2025

A new federal drone restriction just in Nogales has sparked controversy, stemming from concerns over border enforcement tactics and a lack of government transparency.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) told AzFamily that it implemented a no-fly zone for remote-controlled flying vehicles, covering roughly 150 square miles. The airspace is now off-limits to drones from ground level up to 400 feet and will remain restricted until February 9, 2026.

The restriction appears to align with heightened federal efforts to combat prohibited drone use along the U.S.-Mexico border. 

Federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), have expanded counter-drone operations in the area, as cartels increasingly rely on drones to move illegal drugs and other activities.

While the FAA has not been clear about this mandate, communities are left to question the lack of detail and oversight.

New Requirements

A "special government interest" (SGI) waiver is now required for anyone who wants to fly drones in the area. FAA approval is needed for this procedure, and it is usually only given under very specific guidelines. News media personnel are covered by the waiver, but there are worries about the obstacle it poses to real-time reporting.

Questions about how the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) plan to make sure the flying restriction doesn't interfere with journalistic efforts or reporting.

This recent development builds on a broader crackdown that began during the Trump administration. 

Government Authority

The White House had issued a statement earlier this year giving DHS the authority to neutralize drones operating within five miles of the southern border. The administration then cited national security risks and the need to enforce immigration laws more aggressively.

According to the statement, previous enforcement in recent years has contributed to a sharp increase in unauthorized entries, with millions of migrants crossing the southern border or flying into the U.S. through legal ports of entry. 

Beyond security, the financial burden of undocumented immigration has also been a point of contention, with billions in costs reportedly falling on federal, state, and local governments.

As the federal government continues to prioritize border enforcement, the drone ban adds another layer of control in the area already marked by intense surveillance and security operations.

However, with limited information released about the exact reasons for the restriction, questions remain about the balance between safety and civil liberties.

Related Posts

Ericka Piñon

Ericka Piñon

Ericka Pinon is a state and federal reporter for Cactus Politics. She was born and raised in Phoenix, Arizona, and is fluent in both English and Spanish. She is currently studying Journalism and Mass Communications at Arizona State University.

Subscribe to the newsletter everyone in Arizona is reading.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Related Posts